To determine whether the instructions had an impact on the relation between implicit and
explicit measures, a multiple regression equation with IAT scores, a dummy variable coded for condition, and their interaction term was used to predict the explicit index. The predicted interaction was revealed, t (102) = 2.23, prep = .940, d = .44.The IAT predicted explicit measures of self-esteem in the honest condition, b = .30, t (52) = 2.26, prep = .94, d = .63, but not in the control condition, b = -.12, t < 1. Thus, explicit and implicit measures of self-esteem corresponded when participants were implored to avoid over- or under-presenting themselves on the explicit measures.
这里Prep（rep是下标）是什么意思？d是什么意思？
explicit measures, a multiple regression equation with IAT scores, a dummy variable coded for condition, and their interaction term was used to predict the explicit index. The predicted interaction was revealed, t (102) = 2.23, prep = .940, d = .44.The IAT predicted explicit measures of self-esteem in the honest condition, b = .30, t (52) = 2.26, prep = .94, d = .63, but not in the control condition, b = -.12, t < 1. Thus, explicit and implicit measures of self-esteem corresponded when participants were implored to avoid over- or under-presenting themselves on the explicit measures.
这里Prep（rep是下标）是什么意思？d是什么意思？
